I love this show and Patrick's take on things. Herrera, Sands and this recent alleged E-4 analyst, spot on analysis. If anything Pat gives them too much credit, but I suppose it is not as easy for everyone to spot an obvious liar. So it is good that he goes through with such a fine tooth comb. The response to the Jersey drone thing confuses me a bit. These are human made craft and not particularly sophisticated ones at that. This is certainly a psyop, being pulled by an element of a US intelligence agency/affiliate, against the American/world populace. I do not know why, but it is 1,000% our own spooks doing this. The "golly gee whiz aww shucks" routine given by the government is all you need to know. I could speculate as to motive but that would be pointless. If nothing else, it is a textbook case of how to use disinformation to distract from an actual serious issue. Anyway more of an incoherent rant than a comment, but people's responses have been baffling me, as if the truth is not obvious. Stop staring at the white rabbit people. Tl/Dr: Vetted is awesome, Patrick you are thebest, keep it up brother! -Jesse

Minimal depth, sloppy. It’s not really vetting. It’s just click bait on other people‘s work.

Armstrong demonstrates the weakness of content culture and the drive to post anything to feed algorithms and make a buck. There’s nothing in my sampling that is original reporting rather it is repackaging other people’s work, that if you have interest in the topic, you may already have familiarity with the material. What Armstrong could benefit from is an editor. A concise, 15 minute summary would be of more value than rambling reactions.

There are a lot of pods among this subject or adjacent. How this one eluded me for so long i can’t explain. I have a lot of back episodes I can feast on now. Easily in upper echelon of ufo/uap podcasts out there.