Amateur-hour stuff commenting on people who are vastly intellectually superior. Avoid.

A battle Culture War that they have won is the reinstatement of the teaching of cursive in public school. Why haven’t they high-fived themselves? And despite their dreaded Teachers’ Union’s existence? Is equality under the law such a terrible, “woke,” un-funded mandate? Whilst name checking one complementary review of The Bell Curve, they missed their opportunity of bringing back some classic, National Review, pejoratives from the post-voodoo economics era like “aggregate suffering,” and “compassion fatigue?” And, by the way, how has Alan Bakke’s carer career in jurisprudence worked out?

Why do these people think that anyone would care about their opinions? Zero insight or good faith independent thought. Just banal narcissism. I have no idea why this appeared in my suggested podcasts.

This has to be the worst podcast production company ever. I tried to listen to one full hour but had to stop after 20 mins of diatribe.

I went in hoping for a clever discussion or debate. But these two frequently don’t understand what their listening to. And they clip audio before folks make their points. Avoid at all costs.

I pity people who can’t see the shadows on the wall. A thought experiment: if Jordy Pete has a good glass, why doesn’t the water seep through the gaps in the atoms? Quantum physics doesn’t know. In this way, a scientist believes in Divine. Without the observer holding the Divine in the essence of Mind, the table would be wet. What will the observer do then, use paper towels? Good luck with that, I say. If the observer can (perhaps ought, in this case), by the act of observing not stop leaking between the atoms, the we must infer the Divine by the wetness. The atheist will deny this truth. In the act of denying wetness, the secular/cultural Marxist/materialist hosts illuminate the shadows on the wall. In doing so, they accelerate communion. Sometimes, those who seek to diminish Truth unintentionally promote. In a future post, I will use the analogy of the Moon to further elucidate this point.

Trash

I live for these episodes thank you so much

“Bad faith” arguments made “totally unfairly” - pretty much says it all in the show description. They should probably note the vitriolic mood and the incomprehensible logic as well.

I’m sorry, but this was just a big waste of time for me. Not my cup of tea.

You guys are awesome and funny. Shame the supporters of the people you are providing commentary on decide to just flag your reviews. Shame they don’t follow logic. Keep it up!

Clearly intelligent and funny guys, which makes this so sad. Hoped I could get a good counter to the popular intellectual dark web of ideas but ironically they pretty much espouse the exact sort of dogmatic behavior those in the dark web speak so much about, and sadly they don’t even realize it. It’s the complete inability to capture the nuance of the discussions and just cast character attacks instead. Some of the poking fun was warranted and a bit comical, but really no worthy criticism of the ideas whatsoever. The most hilarious part was knowing the speaker’s intentions, giving no charity towards them having good will, and deeming them racist, then stating that this is was the very thing the subject of the conversation was doing that was so annoying. Hello? McFly? Anyone home? If there were ever a perfect example to prove what the IDW speaks of with this regressive group thought, it would be these two.

The guys are just angry and clearly have not listened to or thought through the material they speak on. They frequently hate on things and assume motives to speakers while making statements that show they clearly have not listened to or comprehended the full range of the speakers work

Garbage show purveying moronic ideology. It worth listening to